ಏಪ್ರಿಲ್ 16, 2025

What's in a (Cinema) Name?

The other day I was driving with my colleague and we talked briefly about movies, although cinema is a rare topic we touch upon. But with friends, it's always 99% and remaining one percent consists of family philosophy and other things. I often get confused between tamil and malayalam cinema, I mean there's definitely a structure variation on topics or storytelling or making difference between tamil and malayalam. But I'm very 'L Board' with understanding Tamil and Malayalam. The other day, I started playing Sookshmadarshini and it's a malayalam movie, but some random click here and there which I don't know, the movie started playing in Tamil for first ten minutes and I didn't even knew the difference. At one point in movie a line comes something like veetik polama or something like that! I immediately recognised it's tamil word for home and checked settings above and switched to malayalam and continued the movie. I also struggled with getting the name right with malayalam Cop Drama Thalavan because I often got confused with Thavalan and my AI buddy Scarlet Johansson would rectify it. Later I reminded myself a code world, Thala 7, MS Dhoni, so it's Thalavan and not Thavalan. This confusion happens often because Tamil and Malayalam are my 5th and 6th language respectively and It's getting tougher as I'm now stepping into korean as well. My cousin told me to watch this korean rom com, You are my destiny. I was half interested to watch it, but watched anyway and within one episode I learnt some word dubuchi dubuchi which is either sorry or thank you, I don't remember it well as it was an year ago or so. I don't know if they have korean title for it, but although the english title is long, it's unique and helps audience to remember well. For example, If I type sriram movie, even google will get confused, it might think if it has show movie related to Lord Sri Rama, or telugu movie starring Uday Kiran or kannada movie starring Shivarajkumar. That's the school of thoughts which made us end up here, about the movie names and it's importance, uniqueness or silliness and other things.


If you're into cooking and humor, you might have known about Uncle Roger youtube channel, it's less about cooking and more about roasting other cooking channels especially Jamie Oliver. I came to know about his channel after that viral reel with kids saying 'Emotional Damage' to their teacher, that was funny, cute and hilarious. In one of the videos of Uncle Roger, he says you cannot f_ck up egg fried rice, the recipe is very simple, all you need are three things, egg, fry, rice, that's it. And I laughed out loud as it was very clever joke. There are many such recipes which has such simple and straight forward names. Like if you know hot to make rice bath, it's easy to make tomato rice bath, avarekaal rice bath, and so on. Even that bellulli kabab video that went viral has similar vibe, you need bellulli and you make kabab with it. On the same logic, while I was thinking about movie names, there's a recent political statement by Jaya Bacchan sparked a debate on internet. I will keep my political analysis from low to none and talk about cinema only. She said, toilet and padman, Is this a movie title? Is this how you keep a title and went on saying I wouldn't watch any movies with such titles. Well, I personally haven't watched those two movies by Akshay Kumar but I do have higher respect for him to make such social concerning movies. Toilet talks about how sanitation is important and how the newly wed wife refuses to come to husband home which doesn't have a toilet and padman is about sanitary pads and educating the system or society about it. I don't know if the movie is good or bad, but let alone judging the movie with it's title felt very wrong for me. Yeah they say Don't judge a book by it's cover. On the contrast of it, one day in our school, almost like by year end, our teacher asked a text book from one of the last bench kid and it was almost clean and neat like a new book. The teacher said woww, you maintained the book very nearly and the class clapped and he felt great, to which the teacher said, meaning you have not read the book all year, that's why it's not torn and went ahead to show the topper kid's book. It was sarcastic but I got the point. Don't judge the book by it's cover. Someone may write aristotle philosophy blended to Oppenheimer and the cover maybe bad because the designer wasn't available. So, all this toilet and padman incident made my belief stronger, never judge a movie by it's title or it's trailer. Because, there are movies with very bad title and trailer and it's one of 10 movies I take it to my grave, if allowed. But some trailers are so good, and you watch movie and you realise, only the parts that are in trailer are worth my money. In that context, there are some movies with some great names and with mediocre names and with very very lengthy names, depends on the situation and the subject movie is dealing with, we will explore that further now.


As a writer, I mean, I know I'm not George R R Martin, I feel it's hard to name my characters of which I'm writing a story. And I have written some scripts alone, with AI and vocally with friends. Sometimes, titles come first, movie comes later. And sometimes the contents comes first and it'll be in working title for many days, like I had the title October Masadalli (Translation: In the month of October) since 6-7 years, but wrote a love story feat Daali Dhananjaya last month. I also translated the same story according to Telugu setting and nativity starring Anand Deverekonda and named it Subbaraju weds Peru Thelidu as that felt apt title for the story in Telugu premise. Although the core theme of the story is same, I felt different title would suit according to different culture and nativity. Sometimes, one title is suitable in every language, like we cannot come up with a better title than KGF for KGF movie, irrespective of which language it is releasing. When you think about it, some movie titles are simple, some are symbolic, some are taken from a song and some are saying things poetically and it's the writer's choice to name it to feel suitable to content it has. I also wrote an alternative title article for movies some time ago. There was also this joke I saw on internet once. It suggested 3 idiots title suits well to Student of the Year and vice versa.


As shown in the above example of October Masadalli and Subbaraju weds Peru Thelidu, I came up with October Masadalli first and wrote the story 6-7 years later. And wrote the title Subbaraju weds Peru Thelidu while I was wrapping up the loose ends in story, as at one point in time, Subbaraju had three girls to choose his bride from, so the title would be humorous take on that situation. But sometimes, even after finishing the article or story, I'm still struggling to get name for it. RRR is the best example for such titles headache. They kept it RRR for three years and honestly I couldn't suggest a better title as I know already what happens in the movie. I'm glad they expanded RRR into Rudram Rudhiram something something. Since it was simple and memorable, I think it was easy to tap in to overseas audience. Like consider this example, One flew over a Cuckoo's nest, and in kannada it's translated to Ondu Pakshi Innondu Cuckoo Pakshiya  Goodina mele haari hoyithu, it's not easy and not rhythmic and tough both for other language or own language audience. Madhavan and Dia Mirza starrer movie Rehnaa Hai Tere Dil Mein, that's a poetic and feels like a line from Gulzar sahab. They often called it RHTDM to make it crisp and easy to remember. Similary, K3G for Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, KANK for Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna, SOTY for Student of the Year and so on. Well, it's not official, but it's short and crisp and conveys the point across. Like the lengthy movie title suits well but we have other ways to adapt to a shorter title. Like Alaa Vaikuntapuramlo sounds cool and like a poetry, but doesn't mean the same thing when it's made in hindi. In kannada, they remade the movie from malayalam and kept the title Aapta Mitra, as Vishnuvardhan played a major role in solving Nagavalli issue in the movie and he was a best friend one can wish for. Same director, P Vasu made the movie with Rajni and kept the title Chandramukhi, (Nagavalli new name for telugu and Tamil version) and they kept the title Chandramukhi instead of focusing on Rajni.


When I was kid, I was exploring Telugu and Tamil cinema and wondered what would be best title for the movies I'm watching, if it's remade in kannada. Indra starring Chiranjeevi was remade in Kannada and they kept the title Sriram, pretty straightforward and changed according to nativity. Kannada movie Kothigalu Saar Kothigalu implying men's mind is much similar to monkeys, always hopping on from side to side. And in telugu, they kept Sandade Sandadi, implying the chaos and festival feels of the movie. Sometimes, they make a movie and while in post production, they realise the movie name is already taken and registered. Like this thing happened to Khaleja starring Mahesh Babu. So they made it Mahesh Khaleja and went ahead with it. Legally, it's Mahesh Khaleja, but fans often say Khaleja and it's a great thing, like fans are the ultimate judge. Similar thing happened to Jailer movie, they made Jailer tamil movie and kept the same title, but in Malayalam, the title was registered by someone else, so they went ahead with Rajni Jailer in Malayalam and called it a day. Dasara movie starring Nani in telugu is called as Dasara and in kannada, it's given title as Nani Dasara, because of the conflict as the title Dasara was already with producer Sharmila Mandre. As they say, man proposes and God disposes, sometimes we think of something and something else happens so we take what we have and play the game with the cards we have been dealt. Coming to Yogaraj Bhat movie Panchatantra, it was earlier named Rangappa Complex and later renamed as Panchatantra, although the title didn't make much difference here, it was right decision to side with Panchatantra as it had youth connectivity more.


Sometimes, movie or pop culture reference blend so well in our life, we never think about it outside of it. Like one instagram post asked, "what's your favourite movie?" It's a pretty straightforward question with pretty straightforward answer. Since it was an English page, I went ahead to answer Spiderman 3 as I watched it last month or so and I checked some other comments as well. It varied from The Godfather to The Shawshank Redemption to 6 Underground to Abre Los Ojes and interestingly, one comment said "we don't talk about it". I have seen nearly 200 english movies, that I'm sure of, but never heard this title, which one was it, I kept thinking and it instantly hit me, ohhh it's fight club because in the movie Brad Pitt has a monologue that says, first rule of fight club is we don't talk about fight club and second rule of fight club is we don't talk about fight club. Saying the same rule implies that this rule is must and should be followed at any cost and the audience brilliance of commenting "we don't talk about it" instead of fight club felt fascinating to me. That's the impact of pop culture, we never know how much it is with us until we stand outside and think on it. Similar thing happened in Pokiri movie, it was a blockbuster and ran for nearly an year or so. Puri Jaganadh mass dialogues and Mahesh Babu core rowdy element gave immense kick. The story of Pokiri title is fascinating and this must be recorded and should be taught in film institutes as well, trust me, it's that epic .


Anyone who has seen Pokiri movie will say Nassar monologue before getting killed by Prakash Rai, the elevation by a proud father like him gives to his song is next level. For 90% of movie, Mahesh Babu is seen a Pokiri, as the title would say, he fights with Ashish Vidyarthi, a police and kills many goons as another Pokiri would do and by the very end it's revealed he was s undercover police? That twist landed so hard that even today Telugu audience call Pokiri range twist in everyday usage. In the Nassar monologue, he describes his son and his greatness with cadet no this, topper of the batch, so and so, it also included Krishna Manohar IPS, S/o Surya Narayana or something similar. The earlier working title was S/o Surya Narayana and Mehar Ramesh, who was assistant director of the movie suggested that movie title S/o Surya Narayana would give away end twist and then they changed it to Pokiri and no one was prepared for the twist and hence the line Pokiri range twist is still alive in the pop culture world of Telugu audience. Told you, the story is as epic as epic can get!


Cinema titles in general should be about movie or what happens in the movie or where the movie happens. As I said, some are straight forward, like that movie Santhu Straightforward feat Yash. It's about Santhu (played by Yash), who's pretty straightforward throughout the movie. His another movie Googly title doesn't make any sense if you don't watch the movie, the caption is love spin. In the movie when Yash loves Kriti, Kriti doesn't love him and vice versa, and after finishing the movie, one would say Googly is apt title as the love is always spinning between them. The Shawshank Redemption is about the a redemption story based in The Shawshank jail. Prison Break is a tv series about well as the name says, breaking out of prison. Sometimes, title are as simple as it can get. But sometimes you need more poetic knowledge or philosophical depth to understand it. H2o movie deals with Kaveri river issue which is a matter of great conflict between Karnataka and Tamilnadu. The movie deals on higher symbolic notes like Upendra and Prabhudeva are fighting for Kaveri played by Priyanka who is the daughter of Tamil Man and Kannada Woman. So, Kaveri belongs to both Karnataka and Tamilnadu and the fight between Upendra and Prabhudeva is symbolic representation of how Karnataka and Tamilnadu were and is fighting for Kaveri water, so the title is also symbolic, it's H2o, chemical symbol for water, and it still blows my mind. Some movie titles are lengthy but it says everything what has to be shared about movie. Example, Killers of the Flower Moon, it is about Well, Killers of the Flower Moon. Same with The Wolf of Wall Street, Once Upon a Time In Hollywood, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, Sukha Samsarakke 12 Sootragalu and so on. The movie title may be lengthy but it shows exactly what you want to know about the movie. And as I shared earlier regarding the H2o example, some movie titles are as symbolic as symbolism can get. Upendra directorial movies has such symbolism aura. Like UI name is based on UI but taps entirely on new intelligence called as Universal Intelligence, hence the name UI. Swastik movie is about terrorist bombing and patriotism but the title is swastik because they used swastik in map by terrorists to place bomb and used by protagonist to find out the location and defusing bomb with the same map lm swastik. Shhh is about a scary Ghost somewhere deep in the remote estate area, Shhh is meant to say keep silent because of the horror that unfolds. And so on, Upendra has a clever knack for that and if you know me, you know me I'm big fan of that (him).


And now speaking of poetic titles, kannada movie Antu Inthu Preeti Bantu is taken from a song from Milana, Aaduvari Matalaku Ardhale Verule is taken from a song from khushi movie, hindi Ramayya Vastavayya movie is taken from a old Hindi song Ramayya Vastavayya which is taken from telugu line Ramayya Vastavayya, the same song was also remixed in jawan movie, I think so. Since they are from song beginning lines or somewhere in between, they are poetic and it tells the story of the movie title in it's own way. Some movie titles maybe lengthy, but as I said, they convey the point across. Two movies of Steve Carell are great example of that, one is 40 year old Virgin and another one is Crazy Stupid Love. The 40 year old Virgin is a simple and long title and it is basically about one Virgin guy, who's 40 year old. And Crazy Stupid Love is about two or more love stories in the movie which shows the craziness and stupidness of the love we feel and see. Reports say, Steve Carell initially opposed the title Crazy Stupid Love as it feels crazy or stupid to ask for the ticket of that movie. Imagine you're at a theatre and ask for 'One ticket for Crazy Stupid Love' please and it feels both Crazy and Stupid to ask at that time. Carell was right, but after watching the movie, no other title feels right as suitable as Crazy Stupid Love.


Well, to conclude, some movie titles are very simple, like Arya. What's the title of movie? Arya! What's the character name? Arya! On whose life the movie is about? Arya! And some are lengthy and complicated, but they convey the point across, like that birds of prey movie, it's full title is Birds of Prey: And Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn. As life is both simple and complicated, the movie titles also have various style, shades to it, like 50 shades of Grey! Sorry, had to insert that Dakota Johnson movie name somewhere, sorry, I know it's PJ, but it's my PJ, so it's PT PJ, haha. That being said, there is a story behind every movie name and every movie has some part of it told in the name of it, like this article, it's titles what's in a (cinema) name? It's taken from William Shakespeare line and it talks about cinema names, as highlighted in the (bracket). Ending the article where we began, with it's title, how about that?! 10/10 for effort, would you say? Drop your thoughts in comments

ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 14, 2025

Upon a Empty Bridge

The moon is full today
And so are my thoughts 
About us, the day we met
Of all the things
I wanted to say
I couldn't say all of them
Or one of them
I am not good with words
I am just a dreamer
I saw us together 
Upon a empty bridge 
We looked at the moon
And we dreamt together 

ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 2, 2025

I had a conversation with chatGPT and it went swiftly among various topics

What's in a name
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

That depends on what you're asking!

If you're referencing Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet," suggests that names themselves don't change the essence of things.

If you're asking more generally, names carry identity, meaning, history, and sometimes expectations. They can reflect culture, family, personality, or even destiny.

Were you thinking of something specific?

You said:
No I'm being general
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Got it! Names are interesting because they shape perception—both how we see ourselves and how others see us. Some names carry deep historical or cultural significance, while others are just sounds assigned to a person or thing.

In some cultures, names are chosen based on meaning, astrology, or ancestry. In others, they might be trendy or passed down through generations. Even the act of renaming—whether a person changing their name or a company rebranding—can signal transformation or a new identity.

What about you? Do you think names define us, or are they just labels?

You said:
That depends on person to person scenario
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Exactly! For some, a name is just a label, something practical for identification. For others, it holds deep personal or cultural significance. Some people feel strongly connected to their names, while others might change them to better fit their identity.

It’s also interesting how names can influence perception—studies show that certain names can affect job prospects, social expectations, or even personality traits people associate with them. But at the end of the day, it’s the person behind the name that really matters.

What’s your take—do you think a name can shape a person’s destiny, or is it more about what they make of it?

You said:
Yes, like leonardo dicaprio name sounds cool
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Yeah, "Leonardo DiCaprio" has a certain elegance to it—partly because "Leonardo" evokes Da Vinci, and "DiCaprio" has a rhythmic, almost cinematic quality. Some names just have a natural charisma.

It makes you wonder—if he had a more common name, would it have affected his image or career? Probably not his talent, but maybe how people initially perceived him.

Are there any other names you think just sound cool or iconic?

You said:
Brad pitt comes close Kevin hart is perfect I think Narendra Modi too
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Yeah, those names definitely have a strong, memorable quality!

  • Brad Pitt – Short, punchy, and easy to say. "Pitt" adds a bit of sharpness, making it sound strong.
  • Kevin Hart – Perfectly balanced. "Kevin" is friendly and relatable, while "Hart" (which sounds like "heart") gives it a warm, charismatic feel—fitting for a comedian.
  • Narendra Modi – Has a rhythmic and powerful sound, especially in an Indian context. "Modi" is short and distinct, making it easy to remember.

It’s interesting how some names just feel iconic. Do you think it’s the names themselves, or do they become cool because of the people behind them?

You said:
People make names names doesn't make people
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Exactly! A name might sound cool, but it’s the person behind it who gives it meaning and weight. If Brad Pitt weren’t a superstar, his name would just be another Brad. If Narendra Modi hadn’t become a political leader, his name wouldn’t carry the same impact.

At the same time, some names do seem to have a natural edge—like how "Bond, James Bond" just sounds smooth. But ultimately, it’s the reputation, achievements, and personality that make a name legendary.

Are there any names you think got famous purely because of the way they sound, rather than the person behind them?

You said:
SCAR name sounds cool, but not the character
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Yeah, "Scar" sounds badass—short, sharp, and mysterious. It has that edgy, almost dangerous vibe. But the character from The Lion King? Not exactly the coolest guy—more of a sneaky, bitter villain.

It’s funny how some names sound powerful, but the character behind them doesn’t live up to it. Like, imagine if "Scar" had been a heroic lion instead—his name would probably feel even cooler.

Got any other names that sound awesome but belong to disappointing characters?

You said:
Does duryodhana counts
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Yeah, Duryodhana definitely fits! The name itself is strong and commanding—"Duryodhana" can be interpreted as "one who is difficult to fight" or "unconquerable in battle." It sounds like a warrior's name, full of power and dominance.

But the character? He had strength and skill, but his arrogance, jealousy, and poor decision-making made him more tragic than legendary. If he had been a just and wise ruler, his name might have been remembered in a completely different way.

Do you think his name was ironic, or did he live up to it in some way?

You said:
He was Powerful but he also not wise
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Exactly! Duryodhana had raw power, unmatched physical strength, and the loyalty of warriors like Karna and Dushasana. But wisdom? That was his downfall. His arrogance, stubbornness, and inability to see beyond his own pride led to his destruction.

If he had balanced his strength with intelligence—like Krishna or even Bhishma—he could have been a great king. But instead, his ego and hatred for the Pandavas sealed his fate.

Do you think if Duryodhana had listened to good advice, he could have won the war? Or was he doomed from the start?

You said:
He could have because it would be then dharma vs dharma and who would win a battle in good vs good? The better good right?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

That’s a really interesting way to look at it! If Duryodhana had followed dharma and ruled wisely, it wouldn’t have been a war of righteousness vs. unrighteousness—it would have been a battle between two equally strong, dharmic sides. And in that case, the outcome wouldn’t be as clear. The better strategist, the stronger leader, or the one with divine favor (like Krishna on the Pandavas' side) might have tipped the scales.

In a "good vs. good" war, skill, diplomacy, and fate would decide the winner rather than morality. But since Duryodhana let his arrogance and hatred cloud his judgment, he turned himself into the villain of the story.

If he had been dharmic, do you think Krishna would have still supported the Pandavas, or might he have helped Duryodhana instead?

You said:
Krishna would be neutral I think because good vs good seems a fair fight
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Yeah, that makes sense! If Duryodhana had been righteous and followed dharma, Krishna probably wouldn’t have taken sides. Instead, he might have truly stayed neutral, letting fate and strategy decide the war. After all, Krishna supported the Pandavas not just because they were his relatives, but because they stood for dharma while Duryodhana represented arrogance and injustice.

In a fair fight between two equally righteous sides, Krishna’s role might have been more of an observer or a guide rather than an active participant. It would have been a true test of leadership, strength, and wisdom.

Do you think the Mahabharata would still be as impactful if it were a fair fight, or does the story need the clash of dharma vs. adharma to be legendary?

ಜನವರಿ 27, 2025

ದೇವನಿರುವನು..

“ಅಂಕಲ್,‌‌ ಅಂಕಲ್, ಒಂದು ಪುಸ್ತಕಕ್ಕೆ ₹10/- ಆದರೆ,‌ 10 ಪುಸ್ತಕಕ್ಕೆ‌‌ ಎಷ್ಟು ಆಗುತ್ತೆ?”

“ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲಮ್ಮ, ಗೆಸ್ ಮಾಡ್ತೀನಿ, ₹99/-?”

“ಅಯ್ಯೋ ಅಂಕಲ್, ಟೆನ್ ಟೆನ್‌ಜ಼ಾ ಹಂಡ್ರೆಡ್,‌‌ ಅಷ್ಟೂ ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲವಾ, ಆ‌ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕಲ್ಲಿ‌ ಅದೇನು‌ ಲೆಕ್ಕ ಮಾಡ್ತೀರೋ ಏನೋ?!!”

ನಾನು ಮನಸ್ಸಲ್ಲೇ ಅಂದುಕೊಂಡೆ,‌ ಈ‌‌ ಪುಟ್ಟ ಹುಡುಗಿ,‌ ತಮಾಷೆಗೆ ತಪ್ಪು ಉತ್ತರ ಹೇಳೋಣ ಅಂದ್ಕೊಂಡೆ, ಈಕೆ ನೋಡಿದರೆ ನನಗೇ ದಡ್ಡ ಅಂತ ಬಾಂಬ್ ಇಟ್ಟು ನಿಂತ್ಕೋತಾಳೆ, ಮಾಡ್ತೀನಿ‌ ಇರು ಅಂತ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಶುರು ಮಾಡಿದೆ.

“ವಾಟ್‌‌ ಈಸ್ ಯುವರ್ ನೇಮ್?”

“ಮೈ‌ ನೇಮ್ ಈಸ್ ರಿಧಿಮಾ”

“ಅದರ ಸ್ಪೆಲ್ಲಿಂಗ್ ಹೇಳು ನೋಡೋಣ”

“R I D H I M A, ಅಂದರೆ ಸಂಪತ್ತು ಮತ್ತು ಅದೃಷ್ಟ ಅಂತ”

“ಓಹೋ ಹಾಗಾ?! ಸರಿ,‌ ಅದರ ಸ್ಪೆಲ್ಲಿಂಗ್ ಉಲ್ಟಾ ಹೇಳು ನೋಡೋಣ?”. ಈ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗೆ ಅವಳು ತಯಾರಾಗಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಈ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗೆ ರಿಧಿಮಾ ತಲೆ‌ ಕೆಟ್ಟು ಚಿತ್ರಾನ್ನ ಆಯ್ತು ಅಂದರೆ ತಪ್ಪಾಗಲ್ಲ ಅನ್ನಬಹುದು. ಯಾಕೆಂದರೆ ಈ‌ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಅವಳೇ‌‌ ಹೇಳಿದ್ದು, “ಅಯ್ಯೋ‌ ಅಂಕಲ್,‌ ನಿಮ್‌ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗೆ ನನ್ ತಲೆ ಕೆಟ್ಟು ಚಿತ್ರಾನ್ನ ಆಯ್ತು, ರಿಧಿಮಾ ಉಲ್ಟಾ ಬರೆದರೆ M A H I D, ಆಮೇಲೆ R I, ಕರೆಕ್ಟ್‌‌‌ ಕರೆಕ್ಟ್, ಈಗ ಚಾಕೊಲೇಟ್ ಕೊಡಿ” ಅಂದಳು. ಅದು ತಪ್ಪು ಉತ್ತರ ಅಂತ ನನಗೆ ಗೊತ್ತಾಯ್ತು, ಇರಲಿ ಅಂತ ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಮುಂದೆ ಹೋದೆ.

“ಸರಿ‌ ಅವತ್ತು ಕಥೆ ಹೇಳು ಅಂತಿದ್ದಲ್ಲಾ, ಇವತ್ತು ಹೇಳಲಾ, ಓಕೆ‌ನಾ?”

“ಏನೋ ಒಂದು, ಚಾಕ್ಲೇಟ್ ಮಾತ್ರ ಬೇಕೇ ಬೇಕು”

“ಸರಿ, ಶುರು‌ ಮಾಡೋಣ, ಒಂದು ವಿಶಾಲವಾದ ಕಾಡು, ಆ ಕಾಡಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದು ಒಂಟಿ ಮರ ಇರುತ್ತದೆ.”

“ವಿಶಾಲವಾದ ಕಾಡಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂಟಿ ಮರ ಯಾಕೆ ಇರುತ್ತೆ, ಜಾಸ್ತಿ ಇರಬೇಕು ಅಲ್ವಾ?”

“ಅಯ್ಯೋ, ಶಿವಾ ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಭಗವಂತ, ಪೂರ್ತಿ ಕೇಳಮ್ಮ ನೀನು. ಆ ಒಂದು ಮರ ಒಂದು ದಿನ ನಾನು ಮನುಷ್ಯ ಆಗಿದ್ರೆ ಎಷ್ಟು ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿ ಇರುತಿತ್ತು ಅಂತ ಅಂದ್ಕೊಂಡಿತು, ಆಗ ಆ ದೇವರು ಪ್ರತ್ಯಕ್ಷ ಆಗಿ ತಥಾಸ್ತು ಅಂತ ಹೇಳಿ ಮಾಯವಾದರು. ಅರೇ ಶಿವಾ ಈಗ ಬಂದು ಮಾಯವಾಗಿದ್ದು ನಿಜವಾಗಿಯೂ ದೇವರೇನಾ ಅಂತ ಮರ ಕಣ್ಣ್ ಮುಚ್ಚಿ ತೆಗೆದು ನೋಡುತ್ತೆ, ಅದು ಒಂದು ಮನುಷ್ಯ ಆಗಿದೆ. ಆ ಕಡೆ ನೋಡಿ ಈ ಕಡೆ ನೋಡಿ ಥ್ಯಾಂಕ್ ಗಾಡ್ ಅಂತ ಮನದಲ್ಲೇ ಖುಷಿ ಪಟ್ಟು ಪ್ರಕೃತಿಯ ಅಂದವನ್ನು ಸವೆಯುತ್ತಾ ನಿಂತಿತು. ಅದರ ಸುತ್ತ ಮುತ್ತ ಇದ್ದ ಸಣ್ಣ ಪುಟ್ಟ ದೊಡ್ಡ ಗಿಡ ಮರ ಬಳ್ಳಿ ಎಲ್ಲವನ್ನು ಮುಟ್ಟಿ ಅದರ ಅನುಭವವನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿತು. ಆಗ ಆ ಮರಕ್ಕೆ ಬಾಯಾರಿಕೆ ಆದಂತೆ ಆಗಿ ನೀರಿನ ಕಡೆ ನೋಡಿತು, ಆಗ ಅಲ್ಲೇ ಪಕ್ಕ ಇದ್ದ ನದಿಯ ಬಳಿ ಹೋಯಿತು. ಆ ನದಿಯನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ನೀರನ್ನು ಮುಟ್ಟಲು ಭಯವಾಗಿ ದೂರ ನಿಂತಿತು. ಹಾಗೆ ಧೈರ್ಯ ಮಾಡಿ ನೀರನ್ನು ಮುಟ್ಟಿ ನದಿಯ ಒಳಗೆ ಇಳಿದು ಮುಳುಗಿ ಎದ್ದೇಳಿತು, ಈಜು ಕಲಿಯಿತು, ಹಾಗೆ ಕೆಲವು ದಿನಗಳು ಕಳೆದವು. ಅದು ಮನುಷ್ಯ ಜೀವನದ ಎಲ್ಲ ಕಷ್ಟ ಸುಖ ನೋವು ನಲಿವು ಎಲ್ಲವನ್ನು ಒಂದೊಂದಾಗೆ ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಾ ಬಂತು. ಒಂದು ದಿನ ಹೀಗೆ ಮನುಷ್ಯ ಜೀವನ ಸಾಕಾದಂತೆ ಅನಿಸಿ ಅದು ದೇವರನ್ನು ಪ್ರಾರ್ಥನೆ ಮಾಡಿ "ಓ ದೇವರೇ ನನ್ನನ್ನು ಮತ್ತೆ ಮರವನ್ನಾಗಿ ಮಾಡು, ನಾನು ಮರವಾಗಿ ಏನೇನು ನೋಡಲಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲವೋ ಅದನ್ನೆಲ್ಲ ನೋಡಿದೆ, ಆನಂದಿಸಿದೆ ಸುಖ ದುಃಖ ಅನುಭವಿಸಿದೆ, ಈಗ ನಾನು ವಾಪಸ್ ಮರವಾಗ ಬಯಸುತ್ತೇನೆ” ಎಂದು ಕೇಳಿತು. ಆಗ ಆ ದೇವರು ಪ್ರತ್ಯಕ್ಷವಾಗಿ, ಮನುಷ್ಯವಾಗಿದ್ದ ಮರವನ್ನು ಮರಳಿ ಮರವನ್ನಾಗಿ ಮಾಡಿ ಮಾಯವಾದರು. ಆ ಮರ ದೇವರಿಗೆ ಧನ್ಯವಾದ ಹೇಳಲು ಕೈ ಮುಗಿಯಲು ಹೋಯಿತು, ಆದರೆ ಆಗಲಿಲ್ಲ, ಅದು ಅದಾಗಲೇ ಮರವಾಗಿ ಹೋಗಿತ್ತು. ಅಲ್ಲಿರುವುದು ನಮ್ಮನೆ ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಬಂದೆ ಸುಮ್ಮನೆ ಅಂತ ಪುರಂದರ ದಾಸರ ಮಾತಿನಂತೆ ಮನುಷ್ಯ ಜೀವನ ಮರದ ಜೀವನ ಇತ್ಯಾದಿಗಳ ಅನುಭವಗಳನ್ನು ತುಲನೆ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾ ನಿಂತಿತು. ಆಗ ಒಂದು ರಾತ್ರಿ ಒಬ್ಬ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಬಂದು ಮರದ ಕೆಳಗೆ ಕುಳಿತು ಧ್ಯಾನ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದರು. ಬೆಳಗ್ಗೆ ಆಗುವ ಹೊತ್ತಿಗೆ ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಗೆ ಜ್ಞಾನೋದಯವಾಗಿ ಅವರು ಬೇರೆ ಊರಿಗೆ ಹೋಗಿದ್ದರು. ಮರು ದಿನ ಹೀಗೆ ಮರ ಹಾಗೆ ಏನನ್ನೋ ಯೋಚನೆ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾ ನಿಂತಿತ್ತು. ಆಗ ಒಬ್ಬ ಮರ ಕಡಿಯುವ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಈ ಮರ ತುಂಬಾ ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿದೆ, ಇದನ್ನು ಕಡಿದು ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆಗೆ ಸಾಗಿಸಿದರೆ ಒಳ್ಳೆ ಹಣ ಸಂಪಾದನೆ ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ ಅಂತ ಯೋಚನೆ ಮಾಡಿ, ಆ ಮರವನ್ನು ಕಡಿಯಲು ಶುರು ಮಾಡಿದನು. ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಹೊತ್ತಿನ ನಂತರ ಏಕಾಏಕಿ ಬಿಸಿಲು ಶುರುವಾಗಿ ಆ ಮರ ಕಡಿಯುವ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಒಂದೇ ಸಮನೆ ಬೆವರಲು ಶುರು ಮಾಡಿದನು. ಸಾಯಂಕಾಲದ ಒಳಗೆ ಇದನ್ನು ಕಡಿದು ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆಗೆ ಸೇರಿಸಲೇ ಬೇಕು ಅಂತ ಪಣ ತೊಟ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ಬೇಗ ಕಡಿಯಲು ಶುರು ಮಾಡಿದನು ಆಗ, ಕೈ ಕೊಂಚ ಬೆವರು ಹೆಚ್ಚಾಗಿ ಕೊಡಲಿ ಜಾರಿ ನದಿಗೆ ಬಿದ್ದಿತು. ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಚಿಂತಾಕ್ರಾಂತನಾಗಿ ದೇವರಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರಾರ್ಥನೆ ಮಾಡಿದನು. ಆ ದೇವರು ಪ್ರತ್ಯಕ್ಷವಾಗಿ ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಗೆ ಬಂಗಾರದ ಕೊಡಲಿಯನ್ನು ಕೊಟ್ಟರು, ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕತೆಯಿಂದ ಈ ಕೊಡಲಿ ನನ್ನದಲ್ಲ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಿದನು, ಆ ದೇವರು ಆಗ ಬೆಳ್ಳಿಯ ಕೊಡಲಿಯನ್ನು ಕೊಟ್ಟರು, ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕತೆಯಿಂದ ನಿರಾಕರಿಸಿದನು. ಆಗ ಆ ದೇವರು ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯ ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕತೆಯನ್ನು ಮೆಚ್ಚಿ ಅವನ ಸ್ವಂತ ಕೊಡಲಿಯನ್ನು ನೀರಿಂದ ಎತ್ತಿ ಕೊಟ್ಟು, ಬಂಗಾರ ಮತ್ತು ಬೆಳ್ಳಿ ಕೊಡಲಿಯನ್ನು ಮಾರಿ ಜೀವನ ಸುಧಾರಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಹೇಳಿ ಆ ದೇವರು ಮಾಯವಾದರು. ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಮರವನ್ನು ಕಡಿದು ಕಟ್ಟಿಗೆ ಮಾಡಿ ತಲೆ ಮೇಲೆ ಹೊತ್ತುಕೊಂಡು ಹೊರಟನು. ಆ ಮರ ತುಂಡಾಗಿ ದಾರಿ ಉದ್ದಕ್ಕೂ ದೇವರೇ ದೇವರೇ ನನ್ನನ್ನು ಕಾಪಾಡು ಅಂತ ಎಷ್ಟು ಬೇಡಿದರೂ ದೇವರು ಪ್ರತ್ಯಕ್ಷವಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಆ ಕಡಿದ ಮರವನ್ನು ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾರಿ ಹಣ ಸಂಪಾದನೆ ಮಾಡಿ ಮನೆಗೆ ಸೊಪ್ಪು ತರಕಾರಿ ಹಾಲು ಇತ್ಯಾದಿ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡು ಹೋದನು. ಆ ಮರದ ತುಂಡು ಕೊಂಡ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಸಾಮಿಲ್ ಗೆ ತಗೊಂಡು ಹೋಗಿ ‘ಗೂಡು’ ಎಂದು ಚಿತ್ತಾಕರ್ಷವಾಗಿ ಕಾರ್ವಿಂಗ್ ಮಾಡಿ ತನ್ನ ಹೊಸದಾಗಿ ಕಟ್ಟಿದ ಮನೆಯ ಮುಂದೆ ಬೋರ್ಡ್ ಆಗಿ ಹಾಕಿಕೊಂಡನು. ಅಲ್ಲಿಗೆ ಈ ಕಥೆ ಮುಗಿಯಿತು, ಈ ಮೂರು ಕಥೆ ಉಳ್ಳ ಕಥೆ ಇಂದ ನಿನಗೆ ಏನು ಅರ್ಥವಾಯಿತು ಹೇಳು?”.

ರಿಧಿಮಾ ಏನೋ ಯೋಚನೆ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾ ನಿಂತಳು. ನಾನು ಕಥೆಯ ನೀತಿ ಹೇಳಿದೆ. ಈ ಕಥೆಯ ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕ ಮರ ಕಡಿಯುವ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯ ಕಥೆ ನಿನಗೆ ಗೊತ್ತೇ ಇದೆ, ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಎಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದನ್ನು ಮಾಡುವವನು ಆಗಿದ್ದನು, ಅವನಿಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲವೂ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದೇ ಆಯಿತು. ಈ ಕಥೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬರುವ ಮರ ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಕೆಡುಕು ಮಾಡಲಿಲ್ಲ, ಆದರೂ ಆ ಮರಕ್ಕೆ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದು ಆಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಹಾಗೆ ಆ ಮರದ ಕೆಳಗೆ ಜ್ಞಾನೋದಯ ಆದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಗೆ ಜೀವನದಲ್ಲಿ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದೂ ಆಗಿತ್ತು, ಕೆಟ್ಟದೂ ಆಗಿತ್ತು, ಆದರೂ ಆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ತನ್ನ ಜೀವನದ ಮುಂದಿನ ಭಾಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಇತರರಿಗೆ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದನ್ನು ಮಾಡುವುದನ್ನು ನಿಲ್ಲಿಸಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಕೆಟ್ಟ ಜನ ಅಂತ ಇರಲ್ಲ, ಎಲ್ಲರಲ್ಲೂ ಒಳ್ಳೆ ಮನಸ್ಸು ಕೆಟ್ಟ ಮನ್ಸಸು ಅಂತ ಇರುತ್ತೆ, ಅದು ಕೆಲವೊಮ್ಮೆ ಕೆಟ್ಟ ಘಳಿಗೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಇನ್ನೊಬ್ಬರಿಗೆ ಕೆಡುಕನ್ನು ಮಾಡಿಬಿಡುತ್ತದೆ. ಇನ್ನೊಬ್ಬರಿಗೆ ಕೆಡುಕು ಮಾಡುವುದು ಎಷ್ಟು ಸುಲಭವೂ, ಒಳಿತು ಮಾಡುವುದು ಅಷ್ಟೇ ಕಷ್ಟ. ನಾವು ಎಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದು ಮಾಡಬೇಕು ನಮಗೆ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯದು ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ ಎಂಬ ಸ್ವಾರ್ಥ ಬಿಟ್ಟು, ನಮಗೆ ಆಗುವ ಒಳಿತು ಕೆಡುಕು ಆಮೇಲೆ, ನಾನು ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಕೆಡುಕು ಮಾಡುವುದಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂದು ಜೀವನ ಮಾಡಬೇಕು, ಆ ರೀತಿ ಒಳಿತನ್ನು ಪಾಠ ಮಾಡುವ ದೇವರು ನಮ್ಮ ಒಳಗೆ ಇರುತ್ತಾರೆ, ನಮ್ಮ ನಡುವೆಯೇ ಓಡಾಡುತ್ತಾ ಇರುತ್ತಾರೆ, ಅವರು ಬಂದು ಹೋಗುವುದು ಒಮ್ಮೊಮ್ಮೆ ನಮಗೆ ಅರಿವಾಗುವುದೇ ಇಲ್ಲ. ಬಹುಮಾನದ ಆಸೆ ಮೇಲೆ ಒಳಿತನ್ನು, ಒಳ್ಳೆ ಗುಣವನ್ನು ನಮ್ಮದಾಗಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಾರದು. ಪ್ರಯತ್ನ ನಮ್ಮದು, ಫಲವನ್ನು ನೀ ನೀಡು ದೇವಾ, ಏನು ಬಂದರೂ ನಾ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸುವೆ ಎಂಬ ನೇರ ಮತ್ತು ಸೋಜಿಗ ಮನಸ್ಸು ನಮ್ಮದಾಗಬೇಕು. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take ಎಂಬ Wayne Gretzky ಮಾತಿನಂತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನದ ಮೇಲೆ ಮಾತ್ರ ನಮ್ಮ ಗಮನ ಇರಬೇಕು.”

ಸಾಂದರ್ಭಿಕ ಚಿತ್ರ: ವಿಕ್ರಾಂತ್ ರೋಣ 

 “ಅಂಕಲ್ ಚಾಕ್ಲೆಟ್ ಕೊಡಿ, ಹೋಂ ವರ್ಕ್ ಮಾಡ್ಬೇಕು ಲೇಟ್ ಆಗುತ್ತೆ” ರಿಧಿಮಾ ಹೇಳಿದಳು. ಮನೆ ಒಳಗೆ ಹೋಗಿ ಫ್ರಿಜ್ ಇಂದ ಚಾಕೊಲೇಟ್ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡು ಬರುವ ಹೊತ್ತಿಗೆ ಹೊರಗೆ ರಿಧಿಮಾ ಇರಲಿಲ್ಲ, ಅರೇ ಎಲ್ಲಿ ಹೋದಳು ಅಂತ ಆ ಕಡೆ ನೋಡಿ ಈ ಕಡೆ ನೋಡಿ ಕಣ್ಣು ಮುಚ್ಚಿ ತೆರೆದಾಗ ನಾನು ಮರವಾಗಿ ಹೋಗಿದ್ದೆ. ಅಯ್ಯೋ ಅಂತ ಕಿರುಚಿದಾಗ ನಿದ್ದೆ ಇಂದ ಎಚ್ಚರವಾಯಿತು. ದೇವರಿನುವನು ನಮ್ಮೊಳಗೆ ಇರುವನು ಹಾಡು ಗುನುಗುತ್ತಾ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕ್ ಗೆ ಹೊರಡಲು ತಯಾರಿ ನೆಡೆಸಿದೆ.

ಜನವರಿ 13, 2025

C/o Footpath

This evening I was going home and while walking in footpath, a stranger passed by me, he was carrying a huge bag and I curiously looked at it to check what it is. He was a belt seller he had bag full of belts and few in hand. He saw me look at him and showed the belt in his hand and asked me, "teen belt ka ₹200, chahiye?" I signalled no and ran away from there as soon as possible. To put it in perspective, he's a self employed, even when he's off duty, going home from his workplace aka the footpath, he's never off duty. Because he's self employed, which means he is his own boss and he is his own employee. I am not an employee of a software company, even If I am, if anyone asks me If I am empliof that company and asks any help regarding it, I would anonymously try to run away from that place, because as they say, not my circus, not my monkeys. If an employee is at work, he would always give 100% or try to be as better as possible at workplace, that's the ethical value of us Indians. One of the reasons why Dr Rajkumar referred to cinema producers as Annadatharu, because that's the respect we have on the people who pay us to do the work, by which our livelihood is built. That's as basic as I can go to explain the difference between a businessman and an employee. As a business person, the proprietor has 100% risk and thus the income or loss is completely his own. An employee works minimum wage and minimum time and he's paid accordingly and if he's given 110% of effort, he will not be rewarded the profilts, because he's neither the partner, nor the proprietor. And hence, there is and always will be a difference between pay, effort and contribution of a person towards the growth of a company in perspective of employee and business owner. Let's say I supplied tea coffee for Kalki 2898 movie for 3 years and when the movie is made ₹1000 crores, I am not in my right to ask my share of the profit, because all I did was supply tea and coffee. But let's say, I funed some 30-50% of the movie budget and the movie bombs at box office, I would be at 100% risk and I would literally have to sell houses and come to footpath to sell belts like in the beginning of the article. But if the movie makes ₹1000-₹1500 crore at box office, I would easily enjoy the profilts because I kept my home, family and most of assets in line to build that business, in here, a movie. So, I'm in my right to enjoy the profilts. But the question remains, is it ethical to ask employees to work like business partners but are paid like employees who are the first ones to lose job if the company fails? 


I know my answer to it, what is yours? Feel free to comment and rest of it we can continue over our next meet at Rose Dhaba. See you guys. 

ಜನವರಿ 10, 2025

Making and Keeping Business

Two important aspects of business: 
1. Making the business 
2. Keeping the business 

Let's see that through a real event, names changed 

Let's assume there are only two newspapers in the state. One is by Aditya and another is from Preeti. I am currently subscribed to the Aditya newspaper. On Jan 1st, Aditya newspaper boy gave 2025 calendar along with newspaper. That's keeping the business 

This morning, a Preeti newspaper boy kept today's newspaper along with their calendar on my home compound. I thought there was an error as there could have been a new kid who took the job as a newspaper boy, but no it wasn't. They intentionally gave calendar of the year and newspaper of one day as advertisement. The expense of the newspaper given as free to non subscribers might bring in some new subsctriber. And that is making new business.